Secrecy won't help community recover from Perry shootings
Dallas County prosecutor needs to release the DCI's findings about the school shootings
Four grandchildren of slain Perry High School Principal Dan Marburger are shown this summer after the basketball court was renamed in Grandpa’s memory. (Photo courtesy Clinton Herald)
I have fielded a bunch of emails, text messages and phone calls in the days since the school shooting in Winder, Georgia.
Each one is from Perry, Iowa. Each one had the same question for me and the Iowa Freedom of Information Council. Each one came from a parent, teacher or other concerned person — each one asking why the public isn’t allowed to read the official findings by state agents about the shooting at Perry High School and Middle School last January 4.
High School Principal Dan Marburger and Ahmir Jolliff, 11, a sixth-grader, died from their gunshot wounds. Two school employees and five students were wounded but survived. The shooter, Dylan Butler, 17, took his own life before police could reach him.
The school shooting in Perry was the first in the United States in 2024. Eight months later, Perry residents received a painful reminder of that awful morning, this time when news flashed across the nation of another school shooting. A 14-year-old youth is charged with killing two students and two teachers at the high school in Georgia. His father is charged with providing the gun the boy used.
In the months since the Perry tragedy, the community has waited patiently for law officers to complete their investigation and find the answers the countless questions law officers and the public have. The Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation has finished its work and given Dallas County Attorney Jeannine Ritchie a report detailing investigators’ findings.
There have been many rumors surrounding the Perry shootings and the shooter. But there have been many more questions.
Where did the shooter get the shotgun and pistol he used? Did his family know he had the guns? Was he bullied by classmates? Were there any signs he was struggling emotionally? Did his parents have any inkling he had been thinking about mass killings? Were there any encounters that triggered his decision to take the guns to school on the first day after the Christmas break? How did he get the guns into the school without detection? What did the school principal do in the school cafeteria that morning in his futile attempt to calm Butler?
Public wants to understand
These questions and many others do not grow out of some ghoulish curiosity. This is not same mindset that makes “true crime” television programs so popular. The people in Perry and across Iowa want to better understand what occurred at the school and why the events happened.
There is a problem, however: It is difficult for concerned citizens to learn without access to accurate, authoritative information — information the DCI report contains.
But Ritchie, the Dallas County prosecutor, said she does not intend to release the DCI report. She would not answer reporters’ questions, other than to say she is basing her decision on a section of Iowa law that exempts peace officers’ investigative documents from disclosure.
Ritchie is correct in that respect. The law allows the DCI report to be kept confidential. But Ritchie fails to acknowledge another key provision in the public records law, one that gives her, as the lawful custodian of the DCI report, the authority to release it to the public.
Legislature should step in if local officials balk
It is inconceivable this discussion is occurring. School shootings are occurring with troubling frequency and people are worried sick about the safety of children in schools. The intense public interest in the Perry case is not going to be satisfied by the local prosecutor simply saying, “The report is confidential. End of discussion.”
Without access to the conclusions the DCI drew from hundreds of interviews, from its analysis of social media posts and from investigators’ study of the two guns the teenager took to the school, Perry parents, teachers and community leaders are no closer to getting answers to their questions than they were in those first frightening hours after the shots were fired.
If government officials are not going to provide authoritative, detailed findings and conclusions about a tragedy like the one in Perry, then it is time for the Iowa Legislature to step in and change the law to bring needed common sense to the balance between openness and secrecy.
In the meantime, the county attorney needs to explain to the people of Dallas County why she is keeping them in the dark. It’s their kids. It’s their schools. They are the ones who are still grieving.
“Stray Thoughts” is part of the Iowa Writers’ Collaborative, a rich variety of columns and opinion articles written by more than 50 Iowans and former Iowans. You will find links to their columns here. Please consider subscribing to the columns you enjoy.
Iowa Writers Collaborative: Roundup
The Legislature's problem with amending the law so that documents of the public's interest are released lies with the strong lobby of law enforcement and county attorneys. Let's remember that we, as constituents, have a First Amendment right to petition our legislators; government does not have a constitutional right to petition itself.
Absolutely, the completed investigation documents should be released. Are you able to file a FOIA request? Transparency - no matter the issue- is always better.